There are some insightful points about vehicles in this post, but they are buried under so much RAGE that I am afraid of getting burned if I examine them too closely.

Does he meet the age requirement?

He does, you don't... Atiim should be doing this not me...

Yes.
Yes, you really can. I'm quite confident in your ability to demonstrate that actually, it's possible to be a lot worse than CPM0.

"Fact is no one represents my playstyle, i main in vehicles and yes you infantry scrubs will always hate vehicles but frankly i dont want a bunch of infantry scrubs completely ******* up my playstyle which frankly has already happened several times over because you dont use vehicles"

I would humbly suggest you do your research on existing candidates and their play styles before making said assumptions.

You do realize that being a member of the CPM will allow you to accomplish none of this right?

Listen to most podcasts I've been on. I've been brought in as a Vehicle driver. A lot of my posts and threads have vehicle references.

I'm also a huge advocate for not balancing AV / Vehicles by numbers alone.

If you'd done you research, you'd know, without a doubt, that I'm a Vehicle user.

I'm not interested in a debate. What I don't want to see is a candidate so bent on being the bitter vet, who will likely be overlooked due to trying to drip poison on the aspects of DUST that we can salvage for the time being. All that will do is put more pressure on the CPM1 members who want to try help, and further ruin the reputation of any future CPM, whether in DUST or Legion.

You may well have insights that could be valuable to the community, and ANOTHER voice for Vehicles is never a bad thing. However, you need to get off your bitter vet binge, get on the wagon, and show some support for CCP. They are a corporation, yes. They want to make money, yes. But there are a lot of games out there that don't get a second lease on life. They fail, the corporation pulls the plug. End of story. At least CCP is giving it another run.

The absolutely LAST thing CPM1 needs is a candidate who has, for recent posting history, said nothing positive about the game and has done little but attack any decision made by CCP. You don't always know the full story behind everything, and your lack of active research shows that you aren't willing to look into these issues to find answers, but are hell bent on judging everyone involved.

The CPM0 could have no more stopped the decision CCP made than they could stop a Road Train with their bare hands. And though certain CPM0 members are exalted for either leaving, or being 'removed' from the CPM by the community, it only makes anyone trying to work for the game, rather than against it, less able to do so.

I really hope you can pull yourself out of your own rage cycle, and offer us something worthwhile. I'm sure you have it in you.

Black Jackal didn't mention things pertaining to vehicles simply because its irrelevant to the CPM. They have no power over things involving game development, nor do they have the power to change the game as they see fit.

I could understand trolling in General Disscusions, but the fact that you've decided to be inflamatory in your own campaign thread makes me question if your serious about running for CPM1.

You clearly have no idea on the tasks and responsibility of the CPM, so I would suggest reading the CPM While Paper, and the revised Open Letter Towards CPM1 Candidates; then making the decision of whether or not you want to continue running.

I'm very sure that Takahiro has insightful ideas about vehicles and how they could/should work, but I really have to agree with Jackal here. Your posts mostly flame CCP, and that's not something I would be looking for in a candidate.

As I said, I'm 100% sure you have some good ideas, and I wish you the best of luck in running for CPM.